ethecofem

Obligatory Superbowl Ad Post

February 9, 2010
Leave a Comment

by April

Only, I’m going to talk about the ones I did like.

In this commercial, you have a group of women meeting for their book club. The host’s husband comes downstairs and says goodbye, as he’s off to do something more fun than a girly book club, until he sees that the ladies have Bud Light! So in order to get some Bud Light (these commercials act as though these people can never just go get their own), husband sticks around and pretends to be into the book club. Oh, look at how much he’s willing to sacrifice — acting like a girl! — to get some Bud Light! Must be great beer… Not to mention, he’s got a one-track mind, like all men. Beer, and ladies! Those are the desires that drive him, he just can’t help it.

That’s the obvious, run-of-the-mill sexism. What I liked was that the women were not portrayed as superficial airheads, and they were drinking beer. Not beer that was blatantly advertised as “girly,” not beer that over-emphasized it’s lack of carbs or calories, but just beer.

Beer companies never advertise to women! Ever! It’s as though they believe that women are naturally born to loathe anything that doesn’t taste like a strawberry filled with high fructose corn syrup.

Anyway. This pleased me.

And the next:

Once again, Bud Light FTW! I have exactly the same thing to say about this one as the last. There’s the constant reinforcement that men are reckless, one-track-minded idiots, but there’s a non-condescending, non-degrading portrayal of the women in the ad. The woman is the one who is trying to get them off the island, and succeeding in her specialized knowledge of electronics, and she’s not portrayed as un-feminine (to be un-feminine, of course, means is unattractive and unpleasant).

Well, thanks, Bud Light, for noticing that not only are women not stupid, and not only do we not exist simply as an object of drunk men’s desires, but that we also like beer!

…And next year, can you please try to show men being at least halfway human, as well?


Learning Feminism from Cable TV

January 31, 2010
2 Comments

Hey kids- long time no see!

I’ve been a little busier than I’d like to be, so must apologize for my absence. In the rare moments of freedom I’ve had, I’ve been thinking and jotting down ideas that tend to be scattered, complicated and not easy to form into something readable. Since that’s allowing too much procrastination, I’m just going to give you what happens to be on my mind at the very moment. And it might be a little shocking…

Due to my inability to resist horrible TV, especially if it seems like it could have even the slightest relation to women’s issues (read: 99% of all programming), I watched a Lifetime made for TV movie last weekend. And maybe I’m just getting soft, but it seemed like it actually contained primarily positive, arguably feminist, messages.

I know, I know, Lifetime movies are supposed to be the harrowing, usually disempowering stories of abused middle aged housewives, new moms cracking into multiple personalities and Lolita-esque stories of bad daughters stealing their mothers’ boyfriends, right? That sure is how I remember them.

I’m even more surprised to feel this way because the topic of this weekend’s “film” was the fictionalized reenactment of the alleged “Pregnancy Pact” between some high school girls out in Gloucester, MA,  a town that got a lot of attention beginning in June 2008, because of a crazy high teen pregnancy rate, an unfortunate coincidence that was purported to have stemmed from an actual pact (which was never substantiated, and turned out to have been an agreement among already pregnant girls to help each other out).

I expected the movie to sensationalize the story further, be chock full of marginalization, condescension towards  and victimization of the girls involved, and who knows what sort of horrible themes within the virgin/whore dichotomy (not to mention, the potential anti-choice and abstinence-only rhetoric I was totally ready to witness).

But there was little to none of the usual Lifetime nonsense. In fact, there was a pretty clear “progressive” slant in terms of the plot direction, in that the teen pregnancy spike took place in a school that had abstinence only sex-ed. I’m not sure yet if that was the case in reality, but the movie definitely used that as a big agenda item.  The story came mostly from the girls’ points of view, which created a subtext of young female sexual agency. Plus, there was plenty of pro-feminist rhetoric coming from the alum- liberal/professional blogger who was on a mission to understand what had went so wrong in her high school. The theme emerged that this was not a battle to defend the “victimized” girls from predatory boys, it wasn’t to re-virginize the promiscuous daughters, it was a battle to overcome a culture of ignorance and misunderstanding.

WHAA??? But, I’m watching Lifetime? And, oh, the blogger is Thora Birch (yeah, I know!), and she’s gaining trust through interviews with the teen girls, and wait…what is this?…she’s going to reveal what she did about her teen pregnancy? I can hardly stand the excitement! Will she say that she’s had an abortion, thereby reducing the stigma? Seems like she might…Oh wait, if you haven’t seen “Pregnancy Pact” then I better not go any further.

So not only did the Lifetime movie of the week tell the story the way I saw it: if you don’t provide comprehensive, age appropriate sex education and make contraception available to teenagers  that are going to have sex one way or another, you get a big mess of pregnant teens. But it went way above and beyond my expectations by approaching a more constructive conversation about abortion, adoption, child care and female sexual responsibility issues (as in “I wasn’t taken advantage of”, “I’m allowed to have a sexuality”, etc.) than I’ve ever seen on this network.

I’m not about to declare Lifetime a liberal bastion or a champion of women’s rights. But, I’m definitely curious to see what else they’re putting out these days. I certainly don’t have the stomach or gender normativity to enjoy most of their programming, but if the “Women’s” network is actually making strides towards constructively addressing some of the more difficult issues we’re facing ( at least in the white, middle-class, American female world), well that’s something, right?

Next up, telling Lifetime all about the term “intersectionality”…


The fine line between “pushover” and “mean”

January 29, 2010
Leave a Comment

by April

Fairly recently, I wrote a post that included my frustrating experiences with being frequently asked for money or cigarettes while I’m outside during the workday. While I don’t intend to go on another unintelligible rant this evening, let me start by telling you about my day at work today:

I go out for my lunch break at 11:00, light a cigarette, pull out my phone to call my boyfriend, and start walking to the side of the building. A guy is walking with a woman about his age (maybe early twenties) and yells at me, “you got a cigarette?”

“No, sorry,” I tell the sidewalk in front of me, even though I just opened the pack I have in my pocket. I did not just spend $6.90 on a pack of cigarettes to give any of them to someone who doesn’t even have the decency to ask nicely. An unintelligible and disapproving grunt, followed by some kind of disbelieving words I didn’t catch, were uttered by him as they walked away.

After I smoke, I go back to my desk to surf the internet, because I ate breakfast today and wasn’t hungry enough to eat lunch so early. When there’s about 15 minutes left of my lunch break, I figure I’ll just go back outside and maybe call Jesse again, because I’m bored. We chat for most of my 10-minute smoke break, and as I’m headed toward the ashtray on the way to the door, still on the phone, I hear a man yelling very loudly near me. As I have learned in the past 2 years I’ve worked downtown, ignoring people who yell their way down the sidewalk is generally the smartest option, so I don’t pay attention. As he keeps yelling, though, I hear that he’s saying, “WHERE’S NICOLLET?! WHERE’S NICOLLET?!” Now I see that he’s clearly addressing me, and needs directions (Nicollet is a street near my office), so even though I’m on the phone, I turn toward him, point toward Nicollet, and here’s the ensuing conversation:

Me: Nicollet is one block that–

Him: WHAT TIME IS IT?! YOU GOT THE TIME?! WHAT TIME IS IT!!!

Me: …I don’t know what time it is, but [I point to the giant digital time and temperature display on the side of the building] there’s a big clock over–

Him: YOU GOT A LIGHT!! I NEED A LIGHTER!”

Me: I need to go in now.

Him: FUCKING BITCH! FUCKING BITCH! [and several more profane things that I didn't hear, because...]

Me: Excuse me?! FUCK YOU!! FUCK YOU!!! [I go inside, shaking with fury]

Jesse, from the phone: Uh, what just happened?

I was shocked. Absolutely shocked that anyone had the nerve to be so fucking rude, followed by calling me a fucking bitch because I wouldn’t give him my lighter.

You know what happens, 9 times out of 10, when you lend your lighter to someone downtown who’s been screaming at you? They don’t leave you alone. They ask you for money, or a ride, or a cigarette, or they follow you for blocks and blocks until you finally take shelter in a nearby convenience store until he leaves you alone. That’s what fucking happens. And anyway, I was on the phone, and I was CLEARLY headed inside. I did not owe him my lighter, and I do not owe him, literally, the time of day. This man has been yelling at me, for no apparent reason whatsoever, and I most certainly am not required to reply in any kind of polite way to him. Yet, I have, and I even told him that I was heading inside incredibly politely, considering the way he was treating me.

Anyway.

This brings me to a larger point. What I was talking about with Jesse on the phone today was a phone call I’d gotten at work from a man who was very upset that his fraud claim was not being resolved more quickly than the time outlined by Visa and the Federal Reserve, which we were complying with perfectly. I calmly explained the process to him, and he uncalmly and quite condescendingly cut me off and, well, I won’t bore you with the details, but he was just a general jerk throughout the entirety of the phone call. I hung up feeling bewildered, as I usually do, at customers who are so unreasonably rude, when I’ve done absolutely nothing to deserve such behavior. That’s neither here nor there, as I get it, people can just be jerks, especially when they call their bank. But then I went outside and the two incidents above happened.

I wonder. See, I consider myself to be a “nice” person. I consider people’s feelings before acting, and I try to avoid hurting anyone’s feelings when I can. This translates to me being a big ol’ pushover most of the time, though. I rarely say “no,” and I rarely have the wits about me to stand up for myself when insulted or verbally attacked, because I’m so utterly shocked that someone would be that mean, that I freeze.

This time, though, nothing stopped me from screaming “fuck you” at that ass hole, and it felt good. I didn’t go upstairs wishing I’d said something more or done something different; I just went upstairs and told my coworkers about the incident and received much sympathy and heard many similar stories from the other men and women I work with.

Anyway, I can’t help but notice this dramatic dichotomy with myself, and I wonder if other women possibly feel the same way. Either I’m a pushover, or I’m a bitch. I’m never just treated like a reasonably assertive person who states what I want or need, or what I don’t want or need, for that matter. I know that many women talk about being socialized to be “nice” and sensitive, and talk about the double-standard where men can be assertive, but women who are assertive are called bitches or other derogatory names. I’ve never been able to identify with that particular experience, as I can’t recall a point in my childhood or early adulthood where I’ve been explicitly told to “act like a lady,” or discouraged from standing up for myself. My mom is, and always was, one of those women who proudly wore the “bitch” label, and didn’t care if people thought she was nice. I’ve always admired this about her; unfortunately, I just didn’t seem to inherit that particular gene.

This past weekend, our roommate had a couple people over. I was lying down watching a movie, because I was pretty sick all weekend, and I heard, “April, can I bum a smoke? If you don’t want me to, I don’t have to!” I said yes, they’re in my jacket pocket. “You can say no!” was the response.

This confused and irritated me. I was asked for a cigarette, I had some, I wasn’t going to smoke a single one of them in the condition I was in, and I said yes. Being told that I was allowed to tell someone that they couldn’t have something of mine seemed a bit excessive. Of course I can say “no.” They’re my cigarettes.

Of course, I then thought that the only reason I would be told that I could say “no” is because I never do say no. Usually, if a friend or coworker asks me if they can bum a cigarette, I say yes, without hesitation. I don’t mind bumming smokes every so often, and in the rare time when I don’t have any, I know they’ll give me one if I ask, which I have not hesitated to do.

So there we go. I’m seen as a pushover. No one can believe that I’d willingly give away cigarettes (to people I know; not strangers outside, demanding them), so they think there is something wrong with me, and want to let me know that I am allowing myself to be walked all over. This isn’t the case.

Or is it?

I can’t tell. I’m honestly at a loss right now. I’m a pushover, I guess, then when I assert myself, I get called a fucking bitch. Granted, the guy who called me a fucking bitch was clearly on crack, but this is not the first time I’ve been surprised by a hostile response to an assertive statement that I made that I felt was perfectly reasonable.

Interestingly, I read in a book about astrology that I (as a Leo) am likely to cause unexpected violence in people. I’m starting to believe this.

Anyway, so my question is this: Am I probably actually just a pushover who gets so fed up that I’m actually not reasonable by the time I finally assert myself, or are people just assholes? Or, is this actually related to gender expectations to a degree? I’m hesitant to agree that it is, but man I am tired of feeling like I’m just an unreasonable and irrational bitch. I know the majority of people who are reading this do not know me in person, so you can’t exactly tell me if I’m a perfectly reasonable individual, or if I really do deserve such hostility in response to the things I only think are reasonable but actually aren’t, but what are your experiences with this? As a woman, do you feel similarly to what I described? As a man, do you often notice, or feel, that women are being more irrational or unreasonable in their assertions?


Thoughts about Technology, the Internet, and Progressive Values.

January 27, 2010
Leave a Comment

So I thought I’d mix it up a little bit and write a post about something that I know a little bit about: computers. One might ask what computers have to do with progressive, feminist discourse?

Well, does universally available and extremely low cost tools to access all the knowledge and resources of the internet sound progressive? Does the idea of titanic institutions who lack any accountability increasing their control of the information presented to the world concern you? What about those same institutions collecting unprecedented amounts of information about those who access that same data?

Look for a series of posts coming soon regarding these issues and more. Each piece will be presented accessibly and jargon free so that you can make more informed technology decisions. Please feel free to indicated any interest or lack of interest in the comments.

Until next,

N


Posted in Uncategorized

Come on, goddesses– Let’s confuse the dumb boys again!

January 24, 2010
5 Comments

by April

Remember the “what color is your bra” Facebook thing? Where, in order to show that women supported people becoming aware of a disease that everyone is already aware of, we tease and tantalize all the bewildered guys that we’re friends with?

I just got an Facebook message today, with a new one:

OK girlies – time for a new one!
Should we ladies get the guys going again like the other day with the bra
colour? You know it made the Channel 4 National News in the UK???

What sort of weather do we ladies prefer?

Update your status with one of the following:

‘Wet and Hard’ -if you’re a rain lover
‘Soft and Slow’ -if you prefer snow
‘Hot and Steamy’ -if you’re a sun worshipper
‘Hard Blow’ -if you prefer wind
‘I’m easy’ -if you’re not bothered what the weather is like.

Drives them nuts when we all unite like this – scares them half to death -
Goddesses will rule the world again!!!

Copy and paste this and send it to your female Facebook friends!

You’ve GOT to be kidding me. While the bra color game was stupid at best, it at least attempted to bring awareness to a disease that affects many people. What this game does is have girls write sexually suggestive status updates for no other reason than to make guys wonder what’s going on. Then the secret’s out, and *teehee* we were just talking about the weather!!

If I see any of my friends post any of these things as their status update, I will delete them immediately.

If that’s not a complete dumbing-down of everything ever, I don’t know what is.


To the devil with this expectation

January 23, 2010
5 Comments

by Danny

Okay as most people know (at least American) beauty culture expects women to shave their armpits and legs. I know simply by virtue of it being an imposed expectation I don’t like it. Seriously who the hell has any business telling someone what they should to be considered beautiful right? But there’s nothing like a little personal experience right?*

About two weeks ago I decided out of curiosity to shave the hair from under my arms. Having shaved my face for about 15 years I knew enough about hair to know what would happen when I shaved under my arms. And boy did it happen.

I really didn’t like it. I mean yeah it felt smooth for the first day or so but the bumping that happens after shaving was really uncomfortable. The itching is maddening.

Like I said I tried this out because simply to get an idea of what it felt like. But since I am already against the idea of imposing unfair beauty expectations on people the discomfort of trying to conform just makes it even worse.

This experiment makes me wonder. As I said I’ve been shaving my face for about 15 years at this point I wonder if I do it because I like the way my face looks when shaven or because I’m caught up in the expectation of shaving so that society will not write me off as a dirty grizzly man.

* – I know that not being a woman I’m not getting the full experience of knowing how it feels to have society expecting me to shave my arm pits (I have my own set of societal expectations to deal with).


Would you pay for online news?

January 21, 2010
3 Comments

by April

The New York Times is going to be charging for their content.

In the discussion over at Feministe, I wrote:

I think this is okay. I listen to NPR for like, 60 hours a week, and I give them $10.50 a month. If I really read the NYT every day and valued it that much, I wouldn’t really have a problem with it, other than an initial disapointment at paying for something I’m used to getting for free.

I think it’s similar to music downloading. I still download stuff for free once in a while, but I have a paid Rhapsody account and sometimes buy songs on iTunes.

I think that if they make the benefits great enough, eventually, no one will mind.

And then, once I thought about it a little more,

On second thought, though… if this does become accepted by most people, then it’s likely to catch on to other online news sources, which would make free and accessible information limited to people who can’t afford to subscribe to a paper. It’s so great that information is so readily accessible to virtually everyone now, and this could potentially limit information to the people who have the financial means to pay for it.

I’m torn on this…

What do you think about charging for online newspapers? Reasonable, dangerous, expected?


“Girlfriend” is not synonymous with “permanent sex toy”

January 17, 2010
17 Comments

by April

A while back, Jakob Free wrote a post about the desire to have sex with his girlfriend while she sleeps, painting it to be a universal — and acceptable — desire amongst men.

I found this blog post via some feminist self-promotion thread, and commented:

You fuck women while they sleep? You mean, you have sex with a person who hasn’t expressly agreed to have sex with you?

Gosh, that’s sure no big deal. I’m sure I’d totally love to wake up finding myself being fucked. That sounds like A BLAST.

No, wait, actually, it sounds like RAPE.

You can’t possibly be being serious. This blog is a joke, right? Unfortunately, after reading your “what is feminism” post, it appears that you really are as blissfully ignorant as you seem.

A couple days ago, Jakob wrote a follow-up post in response to my comment, and the only other one, which was another female who was offended at the fact that he just admitted to raping his girlfriend and being a proponent of this particular method of rape.

In his post, he used my personal “About” page as an example of why my opinion should not be taken seriously, especially because I talked about beer that I like (“Maybe all that “extra-hoppy beer” got to April’s head.”):

April is a female, but more importantly “an unapologetic liberal feminist.” That’s actually very interesting to me because I am an “apologetic liberal masculinist”. That is, I apologize for thinking that some feminists are nutso.

To help explain his position that initiating sexual intercourse with a sleeping person is morally acceptable, Jakob says:

Sleeping women, the ones that fall asleep in your bed, assuming they’re not a relative or a young child (hence, the women) are usually people that have already given express permission for intercourse.

Yes, they have given express permission for intercourse at the times that they gave express permission for intercourse. This is obviously not possible when one is sleeping. What Jakob seems to be saying is that he believes that once a couple becomes sexually active, that means that each one has unlimited access and control over the other’s body at all times, period.

When I enter into a romantic relationship, or a sexual relationship, or some combination of the two, it is not to be assumed that I am giving my partner unlimited access and control over my physical body. I don’t imagine that anyone reading this would believe that they did this for their partners, or expect it of their partners.

When you want to have sex, and your girlfriend (who you have certainly had sex with before) says she doesn’t want to just then, do you force her to do it, anyway? I’d imagine not. How is it okay to have sex with a woman who isn’t even given the opportunity to tell you that she doesn’t want to?

I wonder, if you woke up in the morning to some sweet thing pleasuring you, would you ask them politely to stop, or scream “rape”? Doubtful.

If I awoke to someone using my body for their sexual gratification, without my permission, and I did not find pleasure in the act, I should certainly not be expected to be polite in my response, regardless of who it was that did it.

Jakob makes sure we understand that he doesn’t like “rape”:

I don’t condone rape. Not a huge fan of it.

The problem isn’t that you like rape and think people should rape and be raped. The problem is that you don’t see how having sex with a woman while she sleeps is a form of rape. Sure, maybe someone might wake up in the right mood and really enjoy the experience. Clearly, Jakob would. And the experience of a longtime, trusted romantic partner doing this when it’s been made expressly clear that it was something they enjoyed and welcomed is not “rape.” That’s because permission or a desire to do that has been made clear by both parties, not because it’s okay to use your partner’s body however you with regardless of whether or not they even know it’s happening.

But to assume that all women should enjoy this and that all men should assume that it’s an okay thing to do without having first had at least a conversation with his partner is erroneous and perpetuates rape culture. Discussing fucking a woman while she sleeps in such a way that implies that you feel that you are entitled to use her body whenever you want, without her expressed approval at the time of the sexual act is perpetuating the idea that rape is okay.

edit 1/18/10: Looks like a bunch of people sure let him have it in the comments to that post. I was pleased to see it, especially since many of them came from men, and other people that came from here in one way or another!

edit 1/30/10: He has taken both posts down. Unsure if that means he agrees it’s bad and he’s sorry, or if means that he’s embarrassed or tired of getting yelled at. Either way, I think it’s good.


One of the unfortunate consequences of the dominant gender paradigm…

January 16, 2010
2 Comments

Don’t expect any sophisticated analysis or world changing insights in the next few moments here. I was a party last night at a friend’s apartment. It was quite a wild evening. On a brief tangent my friend’s boyfriend drives me crazy. He was in his full modus operandi. Loudly pontificating on the merits of a people’s violent revolution over the state, and slapping women’s assess as often as he can get away with it. Apparently class concientiousness does not neccesate any progressive thinking about gender relations. Grr. I’m getting very sidetracked here, I digress.

I met K at this party last night. We enjoyed a breadth of wonderful conversation: animal rights, role playing games (think “nerds” not S&M), poetry, environmental activism, and so on. I was very happy to have met a kindred intellect. However, there was a “problem” that could very likely derail our potential friendship. K was a particularly attractive woman. Very often I find that women, particularly those who are sexually attractive by popular definition, are very distrustful of men’s motives who apparently want to be friends with them.

I think this is likely a natural development that many women get from being constantly pursued from every angle, even from “nice guys”. I think it is valid and understandable. But it still makes me sad that people would otherwise be kindred intellects and wonderful friends may not be because of that kind of systemic reality. Thankfully, I think my authenticity comes through pretty well.

Hugs everyone.
N


Posted in Uncategorized

Music

January 16, 2010
8 Comments

by April

I got a new computer a few months ago, and haven’t yet been able to transfer my iTunes contents to my new Windows Media Player in any kind of easy fashion. In the meantime, I’m looking for some music to listen to (I don’t have a CD ROM on the new laptop).

What artists/bands/groups are in your Top 5?


Next Page »